Research and Publication. Part 6. Key Aspects of the Discussion and Conclusions in a Scientific Article

Abstract

Introduction: Publishing a manuscript in scientific journals allows for the dissemination of knowledge. However, for many researchers, writing the manuscript can be challenging, which delays the communication of their findings. The discussion section is arguably the most difficult part, as it involves interpreting the results, comparing them to existing knowledge, and recognizing the strengths and limitations of the study.

Objective: To provide clear and practical recommendations for writing a strong discussion and conclusion section that enhances the overall quality of a scientific article.

Results and conclusions: The discussion should clearly explain the main findings, compare them with those of previous studies, and address both the limitations and strengths of the research. It is essential to use clear, concise language and terminology that accurately conveys the implications of the results. The limitations section should detail the factors that may affect the generalizability of the findings, which in turn enhances the study’s credibility. It can also be used to propose recommendations or new research questions to guide future investigations. The conclusions should be brief and straightforward, emphasizing the most important findings and their relevance. Ideally, the reader should come away with two or three key takeaways from the study.